When people talk about science they mostly refer to medicine when they want to “prove” that science is “good” (and thus, according to their illogical logic, religion is bad). Medicine is the science which after all makes us well when we are ill. Medicine is the science which keeps us more alive. Correct? Wrong!
If we take a look at what medicine really is we will realize that it is not the best argument one could think of to support science…
First of all, medicine is all based in the very RELIGIOUS idea of “helping the helpless”. In all the initial history of civilization, from ancient Greece to the end of the Medieval Times, religion and medicine where highly interconnected [source]. Then the fake “science vs. religion” war came. [see here] But if we were to stay faithful in the Darwinian idea of “The survival of the fittest”, then we should leave all the sick people just die and get rid of all the “bad genes”…
Furthermore, it is a common mistake to mistake Technology for Medicine. The technology behind a bypass surgery for example is a technology even a plumber could explain and understand: if a pipe is broken, you should fix it. As simple as that. Do not get me wrong. I have talked to people saved by such surgery. What I want to note is that we should not mistake “mechanics” for “science”. Fixing a blood pipe or making a nerve working as it worked before (but without actually knowing what it does when functioning) is too far away from “medical science”. Medicine is a type of applied science, with many elements that are artistic (not “Art”, sorry V cannot describe it any other way), theological and/ or philosophical in many ways. (at least this is what is should be – nowadays the “mechanical” aspect of medicine has overshadowed the other elements mentioned above)
And in many ways medicine could really reduce the quality of your life. In the old days people did not have good diagnostic tools and lived happily until their disease reached a critical point. Now someone might learn that he has a gene problem that could lead to his death until his 60th birthday with a probability of 57%. How could that be an improvement of his life?!?!? Relying too much on gene therapy and on gene prognosis can change the name of “medical science” into “eugenics”. And this is certainly not a good thing!
However it is true that medicine makes us live longer. Let us truly examine the question: how important is that? We all live (in the western world) about 80 years more or less. How important is it that a specific technology prolongs the life of a person for 2 or 5 years? How important is it that I get to live X years and you get to live X+2 years? If you look at those numbers from the viewpoint of eternity, the argument of “life extension” becomes ridiculous. What is truly important is to live a good life. (and there are strong indications that medicine HAS NOT PROLONGED LIFE in modern world! – see here)
But isn’t having, for example, painkillers an improvement of life? someone might ask. Yes and No I would say. Pain is something we want to avoid. But so is eating healthy food. If you look back at your life you will see that the pain you felt is what defines you. Not the happy moments. How willing are you to live a life without pain? Would that be life at all? I most certainly use painkillers when I am in pain. I am not claiming that I don’t. However I am a weak human being and as such, my habits on such matters should not be benchmarks for the philosophical analysis of the currently debated matter. If you ask me, I will try to avoid pain if I can. But don’t all philosophers claim that the right path is the path with the most pain involved? Are we really in such a position to argue with them?
Finally and regardless of all the above we should examine the ESSENCE of medicine. And it must be noted that its main characteristic is the doctor-patient relationship. Not the technology used. Not the medicine used. The human relationship between two people is what defines the whole medical profession. The oath of Hippocrates, the psychological support, the effect faith has in healing people (medicine can be too “irrational” and too “unscientific” if we bother to look at the depth of such an effect), the proved fact that people who have lost their will to live die more easily than those who want to stay alive et cetera, all point towards the same point: Medicine is about humans. Not about lifeless sets of bones and blood! Medicine which ignores the spiritual aspects of humans is simply not medicine.
Psychology CAN have a vast effect on human health.. Check out here or here. And this is not all. There are accounts of people who were deemed “ready to die” by medicine and when they went into a stress-free environment got better and lived happily ever after… [source]
Medicine today cares only for the part and not for the whole.
Prognosis is good.
Medicine is good.
Technology is good.
But only if you do not overdo it.
Staying too attached to your body as if it is all there is, is not good.
Humans should live. Not consider themselves “complex machines” and try to prolong their “functioning” while having lost the true meaning of life.
13 thoughts on “Why Medicine is NOT a pro-Science argument!”
Wow, you’re an idiot..
Wow. Thanks my friend. It’s an honour to be called an “idiot” from idiots (which is what I think you are based on the “long and well explained arguments” you wrote as a comment). This means I am clever. Cheers! 🙂
Indeed… Being human is more about having strong will than having your painkillers…
Also the question arises, like the WSHTF folks say, “What will people do if they are ever in a situation without easy access to their painkillers and anti-depressants?”
Thanks my friend. We are indeed beings which like excess (as a Greek I can attest to that)…
Excellent feel of the blog, loved it thoroughly.Agree with you that overdose of anything is harmful, be it medicine or technology, but we cant help it, we are progressing towards endangering ourselves by the excessive use of them
You must log in to post a comment.