Future affecting the past 2: The creepy coincidence of Richard Parker(s)…

Photograph of the lifeboat of Mignonette, exhibited at Falmouth in 1884

In Edgar Allan Poe’s only novel The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket, published in 1838, Richard Parker is a mutinous sailor on the whaling ship Grampus. After the ship capsizes in a storm, he and three other survivors manage to catch a tortoise to eat while stranded on the sea. However after some days they have again the problem of survival. They eventually draw lots upon Parker’s suggestion to kill one of them to sustain the others. Parker is the “lucky” one and gets cannibalized by his fellow sailors.

In 1884, the yacht Mignonette sank. Four people survived and drifted in a life boat before one of them, the cabin boy Richard Parker, was killed by the others for food. This led to the R v Dudley and Stephens criminal case. [Hanson, Neil. (1999). The Custom of the Sea: The Story that Changed British Law. Doubleday] The eery pary of the story (well, more… eery than what has already been said above?) is that again the stranded sailors found a tortoise and ate it before becoming desparate to eat one of their fellow sailors. Parker made the mistake of drinking seawater and started getting ill. He suggested to draw straws, but the other decided to kill him anyway since he was ill.

(and yet another Richard Parker died at the  1846 shipwreck of the Francis Spaight)

Weird coincidence?

Or a crude way the cosmos uses to remind us of a simple truth?

Richard Parker’s tombstone

Do scientists believe in coincidences? Or do they try to search for the reason behind every phenomenon they observe? If a scientist is allowed to use ONE single experiment to disprove a century-old theory (and prove a new radical one), why not use such “coincidenced” to disprove the “everything is random” theory many postulate?

Some claim that everything in future and past is interconnected. The one affects the other, as the Chinese think [1]. If we open our eyes and question events that are now (not) explained by “chance”, then a whole new world of unity and harmony will appear in front of our eyes…

Weird stories call out for weird explanations.

Sometimes being “right” is not as important as being able to imagine. Because one can only judge the “correctness” of a theory based on the limited perceptions of his time. So many Richard Parkers had to mean something…

“Future Affecting the Past” Series

Author: skakos

Spiros Kakos is a thinker located in Greece. He has been Chief Editor of Harmonia Philosophica since its inception. In the past he has worked as a senior technical advisor for many years. In his free time he develops software solutions and contributes to the open source community. He has also worked as a phD researcher in the Advanced Materials sector related to the PCB industry. He likes reading and writting, not only philosophy but also in general. He believes that science and religion are two sides of the same coin and is profoundly interested in Religion and Science philosophy. His philosophical work is mainly concentrated on an effort to free thinking of "logic" and reconcile all philosophical opinions under the umbrella of the "One" that Parmenides - one of the first thinkers - visualized. The "Harmonia Philosophica" articles program is the tool that will accomplish that. Life's purpose is to be defeated by greater things. And the most important things in life are illogical. We must fight the dogmatic belief in "logic" if we are to stay humans... Credo quia absurdum!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version