Tags
gay, human rights, minority oppression, nature, normal, sex, transexual
Nintendo criticized for not allowing gay characters in its game. [1] Austria sends… a man feeling woman with a beard to Eurovision. [2] Movies promote gay people having children. [3] Bestiality brothels are ‘spreading through Germany’!!! Animal abusers claim that sex with animals is just a ‘lifestyle choice’. [4]
When you promote abnormality, then there are consequences…
What would you say if necrophiliacs started having their own brothels?
Why not have brothels with… lobsters?
And no, this has nothing to do with the rights of anyone!
Or now that I think about it…
It has to do with the rights of majority which does not want to be oppressed by the minority. It has to do with the rights of nature to define on its own the “normal”. (Gr. “ΦΥΣΙΟλογικό”)
It is another thing to respect all people for what they are and want to do. (all logical progressive people would agree that all citizens should have equal rights independently of their sexual orientation!) And another to have the abnormal impose it self on the normal as the new… normal. This has nothing to do with human rights or progressiveness or democracy. It has to do with simply stating the facts. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Take a look outside your window…
Do the snowflakes have beards?
Are you saying homosexuality is abnormal?
If what nature dictates is “normal”, then yes. But that does not mean anything regarding human rights or how society must treat them. The abnormal is many times better or equally valuable to the “normal”. (although in this case, we do need to have children don’t we?) What do YOU think?
I define having sex with the other sex as the natural way to have babies. I define being what you were born like as the natural way to be. Surely this can go on for ever. You can say this is my opinion. I am not saying anyone can define normal. Indeed no one can. And LEAST OF all those who are obviously far away from what nature defined as such… The specific example was not an example of someone who wanted to be free from the “oppression of the norms”. It is a case of someone who MOCKS both men and women just… because! There are many gays and transsexuals who have dignity and have chosen a different way of living. I am perfectly fine with that. But this is not the case. Philosophy of the paradoxes is my favorite! You will see many aphorisms like the ones you make in my articles. But when it comes to raising a child, you have to define some things. When it comes to building the foundations of a society, “being smart” becomes just irrelevant. When you set NO LIMITS to anything WHATSOEVER, then problems will soon arise. I am sure you have the answers to the questions I pose in the article… Would you like a necrophiliac for example to stay next to you? Would you be “tolerant” against this because… we have not defined “normal”?
Normal? What’s normal? Is being Catholic Orthodox normal? Certainly not statistically.
What is your point? Do you not see any difference between choosing religion and distorting what nature has made us to be? Are you in favor of oppression? Should everything unnatural be imposed as natural?
Choosing an unnatural religion?
Before you make puerile and unscientific statements regarding nature, you have to 1: define nature, 2: prove with evidence that natural is better than unnatural. Until you do that you’re playing word games. Your glasses, for example, aren’t natural- and yet you’re still wearing them.