The true Turing Test. Thinking like a woman. Being a true scientist.


You may have heard that the Turing Test, that old test of machine intelligence proposed by pioneering mathematician Alan Turing in 1950, has been passed (or at least claimed to have been passed) by computer bots emulating human responses to questions.

What you may not have heard, though, is how profoundly bizarre Alan Turing’s original proposed test was. Much like the Uncanny Valley, the Turing Test is a seed of an idea that’s been warped and reinterpreted into scientific canon. The University of Reading deserves to be ridiculed for claiming that its zany publicity stunt is a groundbreaking milestone in AI research. But the test it’s desecrating deserves some scrutiny, too.

“Turing never proposed a test in which a computer pretends to be human”, says Karl MacDorman, an associate professor of human-computer interaction at Indiana University. “Turing proposed an imitation game in which a man and a computer compete in pretending to be a woman”.

It’s right there in the second paragraph of Turing’s landmark 1950 paper, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, published in 1950 in the journal Mind. He begins by describing a scenario where a man and a woman would both try to convince the remote, unseen interrogator that they are female, using type-written responses or by speaking through an intermediary. The real action, however, comes when the man in replaced by a machine. “Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does when the game is played between a man and a woman?” asks Turing. (1)

Thinking like a computer is easy.
Most humans do it.
Thinking like a human is difficult.
Few humans achieve it.
Understanding how women think is truly impossible.
A handful of men understand them and I sure even God would have problems in that.

Truly free is only the thought that is illogical.
Because the whole world is illogical.
Only the paradox is inspiring.
And what could be more paradoxical than a woman?
Logic is based on axioms which are based on… nothing?
Women used to be the godesses to which we believed.
We have stopped worshiping the illogical.
And our logic has drowned us.

We need to breath again.
Turing tried to show the way.
But we killed him anyway.

Science. The art of mainstream.

Author: skakos

Spiros Kakos is a thinker located in Greece. He has been Chief Editor of Harmonia Philosophica since its inception. In the past he has worked as a senior technical advisor for many years. In his free time he develops software solutions and contributes to the open source community. He has also worked as a phD researcher in the Advanced Materials sector related to the PCB industry. He likes reading and writting, not only philosophy but also in general. He believes that science and religion are two sides of the same coin and is profoundly interested in Religion and Science philosophy. His philosophical work is mainly concentrated on an effort to free thinking of "logic" and reconcile all philosophical opinions under the umbrella of the "One" that Parmenides - one of the first thinkers - visualized. The "Harmonia Philosophica" articles program is the tool that will accomplish that. Life's purpose is to be defeated by greater things. And the most important things in life are illogical. We must fight the dogmatic belief in "logic" if we are to stay humans... Credo quia absurdum!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version