Judge the tree by its fruits…


You will judge them by their fruits (Gr. Από τους καρπούς τους και μόνο μπορείτε να τους κρίνετε), said once upon a time a wise man…

And how true is this in todays society. Modern people are full with distrust, with hate, with love for all the wrong things, with greed, with impatience, with lack of time for the really important things…

And no one can say that this is a religion era… This is Science times in which we live in!

The Medieval “dark” times produced saints and knights.

Todays era produces people void of any humanity.

You tell me: which one is “better”?

What primitives knew, What we have forgotten…


Every time we think of us as someone more “evolved” and “better” than our primitive ancestors. We believe that we are improved versions of the people who lived on that planet thousands of years ago, since we “know more”. But we should not forget that “forgetting” is also a function of the brain. And as Levi Strauss said, we also tend to believe that the newer opinions are “better” or “more correct” than the older ones, even if there is no supporting evidence (despite our arrogance) that supports such a general claim.

Ancient Greeks actually thought that the word regresses. They thought that our ancestors years ago were the Golden Genration, that our immediate ancestors the Silver Generation and that they were the Bronze Generation.

In the old days people knew they were something important in the cosmos. They felt “themselves”, they felt what we call consciousness and recognized easily that they were something different from stones and dirt. Today we have analyzed everything all too much and with the help of our mechanistic dogmas we have come to “know” that we are nothing more than “somplicated” stones and dirt. In the olda days people felt that there is more than meets the eye in the world. They felt that there must be a reason for them to “be”. Now we have analyzed everything all too much and with the help of our “randomness-obsession” dogmas we have come to the “logical” conclusion that everything is random. In the old days people felt that “One” which transcends everything. They had time to stay silent, to look at the stars, to reunite with nature and the cosmos. Today we do not have time for such “childish” things, since we are too busy buying things we do not need, playing with Nintendo or writting at WordPress. In the old days people did not know nothing about “time”. Now we almost forget that “time” is a notion created by man for the needs of physics and we tend to believe that what we once knew as artifical to be basic for the universe. People once knew that a thought cannot be the sum of lifeless electrons. Now with our materialistic dogmas we tend to believe that this can actually happen.



We must try to let go of our arrogance.

We must try to remember what we have forgotten.

Is Human Progress an illusion ?

This article attempts to pose (and answer?) the question of whether human progess exists or it is a mere illusion. This problem has puzzled many philosophers and a very tense debate is going on until our days for that matter.


“I do not wish to judge how far my efforts coincide with those of other philosophers. Indeed, what I have written here makes no claim to novelty in detail, and the reason why I give no sources is that it is a matter of indifference to me whether the thoughts that I have had have been anticipated by someone else.”

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus



Humankind changes. Noone can deny that. Over the thousand years we exist on Earth, we have developed many ideas, changed views on almost all issues, fought wars, discovered human rights, advocated even animal rights, explored space, tried to explain the existence of the universe, analyzed mathematical truths, changed our own human genome, increased our knowledge on almost every scientific field, recognized that disabled people must be treated with respect and not as outcasts, build up the idea of democracy. Despite all the above many people think that humans do not actually progress. They advocate that even though we seem to progress, we actually only change but still remain the same as species. For example, we may have improved technology, but the use of that technology hasn’t changed our life much. We still do the same things, just the tools have changed. We still use fire, but in the form of an electic oven. We still communicate, but with e-mail and not simple mail. The underlying reality – they claim – remains the same, just the surface changes. And that is not enough to claim that progess exists. On the other side, other people (including me) think that progress actually is there as a fact.

Progress as an illusion

The ones who believe that human progress is an illusion have some examples to support their opinion. The first example is that of technology progress. In that frame of thought, all things that appear as technological progress are mere a change in the appearance and not something truly real. The cases of ‘fire’ and ‘mail’ were already mentioned in the introduction above.

Many others exist. One may think that using cars, living in modern houses, having court justice system, using political parties as an expression means in a democratic system is something that differentiates us from the people in ancient times. That is simply not true. Ancient Greeks had all these – and in some cases they used it more wisely than we do now.

As far as moral laws are concerned, it can be claimed that people have not morally changed much in the years they exist. People continue to try to steal you, as they did in the old times. People still try to decieve you so as to earn money, as they did in the old days. People still cheat on their wifes / husbands. In a way, things have not changed much in the aspect.

All the above-mentioned observations have led some people to believe that we – as species – remain the same. We do not progress, just change in order to adapt to our environment as all other species do. That is also the reason why many darwinists are in favour of that idea – althrough not everyone who believes that human progress is an illusion is necessarily a darwinist. Many free thinking people who believe in the special traits of humans against the other animals debate on that.

Progress as a reality

There are some counter-arguments in favour of the idea that human progress is true and exists. Before saying anything we must define the word ‘progress’. It can be said that ‘progress’ is ‘changing in a positive way’. With that definition in mind, we will attempt to show that such a thing exists.

The first argument in favour of actual progress has to do with the increase of human knowledge on how the cosmos works. For many years now we have learned a great deal about physics, the nature of matter, how particles interact with each other, how the planets move, why various phenomena take place and so on. That vast increase in knowledge can only be considered as something ‘positive change’, as progress. The fact that we know why it rains, that we understand that lightning bolts are not an act of some god to punish us but a simple natural phenomenon, that we have discovered the underlying nature of numbers, that we know chemistry and that we can predict the weather for the next day (even though not with great accuracy sometimes) seems to be actual progress no matter how someone looks at it.

A second argument comes from the morality field. It is true that we have not been more moral in the modern days when compared with the people who lived in the old days. But one cannot deny that some progress has been made when it comes to human rights. Only in the last 50 years have we recognized as society the equality of all races, the respect for the different, the right of human dignity that applies for all people equally, the right to vote for women, the right to have an unpolluted environment to live in.

Ofcourse some could argue that these are mere products of our current society and not reall change of our selfs. But I will answer to them that we, humans, are social beings. Society should be considered a part of our nature, in the same way as living in groups is considered part of the nature of lions. And there is not reason why every accomplishment of human societies should not be attributed to humans but to some ‘entity’ called society which has nothing to do with us. We formulate society and we decide – via our own free will – how societies operate. Recognizing the freedom of speech as a human right is our progress, not the progress of an ‘alien’ entity.

Some other might argue that the progress in human rights is an accomplishment of western society only and that other societies remain unaware of things like the ‘freedom of speech’. That is true, but I do not think it nullifies the fact that in total, human race has progressed. Even if not everyone is aware of the notion of the freedom of speech, the fact that some people are clearly is an indication of progress.

Technology is not progress

During the last 50 years, the word “progress” is closely related to the word “technological progress”. I do not agree with that way of thinking. Technology is a way to make your life easier, but it has nothing to do with the progress of humankind. An animal can also make its life easier by using a tool. That doesn’t mean it “progresses”. The dominant materialistic way of thinking in the 21st century has distrorted the idea of “progress” and we need to go back to the true definition: progress concerns improvements in our soul and mind, not the use of a stick to get insects out of a hole. And it must be emphasized that the “progress” promised by the materialistic based science at the end of the 21st century is not delivered. In contrast to the recent past when scientists’ thought was more holistic, we cannot claim that today we have made substantial progress on many sectors. Science today only collects vast amount of data, without suggesting any essentially new theories for the cosmos. I certainly hope that will lead science to go back to more holistic ways of thinking, as it used to think back in the good “old” days of Aristotle or even Albert Einstein…Having CD-ROMs and DVDs is not progress…


This article is here to just present my thoughts on the matter and certainly I do not claim the novelty of any ideas written here. The purpose of the article is to stimulate thought on others.

Exit mobile version