Research published today by the American Psychological Association has shown that chimpanzees prefer listening to West African akan and North Indian raga over listening to silence. What does this say about the evolutionary purpose of music?
Previous work by McDermott and Hauser showed that when tamarins and marmosets were given a choice between a lullaby played on a flute, an excerpt of German techno, or silence, they preferred silence. This new research was investigating whether non-Western music might provoke a different response in nonhuman primates. Would the different rhythmic structures and musical scales in non-Western music change preferences? (1)
Primitive people tend to be more nature-compatible than we “progressed” humans are.
We may laugh at their civilization, but they have achieved true ecology without any universities teaching them so…
ALTERNATIVE MESSAGE: Humans have always been different than animals. We have something they do not have, even though we cannot pinpoint exactly what it is. Or can we? Classical music is the epitome of human achievements in art and yet, monkeys do not seem to understand that. Should we be troubled by that? Or… excited? Should we strive for ecology and balance? Or should we just conquer the world? Should we ban Bach and Mozart just in order to be “ecologists”? Or should we stick to what we truly are?
Call it humanity’s unexpected U-turn. One of the biggest events in the history of our species is the exodus out of Africa some 65,000 years ago, the start of Homo sapiens’ long march across the world. Now a study of southern African genes shows that, unexpectedly, another migration took western Eurasian DNA back to the very southern tip of the continent 3000 years ago.
According to conventional thinking, the Khoisan tribes of southern Africa, have lived in near-isolation from the rest of humanity for thousands of years. In fact, the study shows that some of their DNA matches most closely people from modern-day southern Europe, including Spain and Italy.
Because Eurasian people also carry traces of Neanderthal DNA, the finding also shows – for the first time – that genetic material from our extinct cousin may be widespread in African populations. (1)
In the beginning we live with our parents. Then we leave home.
We tend to believe we are more wise than our parents.
And there comes a day when we wish our parents were here again to advise us. Our Neanderthal “parents” are back in their “home”.
The home we have a tendency to mock as “Third World”, as “not advanced”, as “primitive”. There will come the time when we will need their advice again. But then it will be too late. They will be long gone…
> Help translate the Harmonia Philosophica book in 6 new languages and get valuable perks in return! Support the Indiegogo project now!
“We are not worried about the poor dog who is barking, as we are commanding its master to keep its leash tight or else” – Minister Ali Abdu
An atheist friend of mine finds it impossible to believe in God. And yet, he believes that The Netherlands altruistically donate billions of dollars to Africa without expecting anything in return! Just because they are… good people!
One cannot really believe how the nation…
…which initiated commerce (i.e. exploiting colonies and earn millions via slavery OR exploit poor people by making them pay interest) even against the dictation of the then Christian Church that this was a sin,
…which so eagerly sold out all the Jews in its territory to the Nazis (yes, the Dutch people helped immensly the Germans into taking them with trains)
…which denied Greece the help from IMF in case it did not pass harsh austerity measures which cost lives, while at the same time did not vote for similar measures when the time came (!) (1),
has suddenly gone “good” and is giving away… billions!
I am sorry to disappoint those who believe in the existence of an ideal world, where rich people simply care. This is a cruel world. And it is run by rich people. (this is so true that it is almost a tautology)
Charity and philanthropy to nations in Africa means…
1. Earning money: This is the simpler reason and the most obvious one. All people who offer charity earn a tax deduction. (2) The same applies for companies. The Dutch Tax Administration can declare an institution to be an “institution for general benefit” (algemeen nut beogende instelling, ANBI). Often this is a foundation, though not every foundation qualifies. It can also be a voluntary association (vereniging), but not e.g. a sport club, or association of personnel. Also it cannot
be a commercial institution. If in a calendar year the sum of someone’s gifts to ANBIs exceeds 1% of the threshold income, the excess, with a maximum of 10% of that income, is deductible income. Also an ANBI is exempted from inheritance tax and gift tax on inheritances and gifts it receives, except on those made under a
condition such that it is not for general benefit. (3)
2. Salon socialist agenda towards Social control: The point of salon socialists is not that they do not spend money charitably, but rather that they are too high to be actively involved in the class struggle. Charity is seen as a capitalist and conservative project, because it leaves the alleged social structures of hegemony intact, and would even reinforce them (by making the poor dependent on the rich). Charity also implies that mandatory taxation is not needed, or need not collect sufficient funds.
The alleged act of charity is a “rather effective instruments of social control,” to support the deserving poor. It amounts to paying off the poor to behave (“bad” countries like Greece do not deserve to be “saved”). Paul Langford makes a similar assertion about the later flowering of charity in England: the hospitals and foundling homes of the 18th century were “built on a foundation of bourgeois sentiment mixed with solid self-interest”. (4) Giving money to the poor for education also present another advantage: You can easily strip them off their civilization and install your own. No one in Africa even knew of McDonalds or cell phones. Now they all do. They are “educated”. (5)
3. Earn some more money (well, why stop?): The state gives “charity” to buy drugs, pharmaceutical companies sell drugs more expensive than in other markets (or even sell vaccines which are not used anywhere else – see here), the money comes “back” to the right hands… (7) Lobying is also in the agenda. A small charity to warn projects of millions is a very logical thing to do. (8) Non profit organizations are usually – surprise surprise! – PROFIT organizations! See here how a non-profit organization lobbies for new drug trials in India, resulting in dozens of deaths…
4. State control/ Spying: Last but not least, NGOs are the best way to infiltrate a foreign state with hundreds of “workers” and start applying your foregn policy. There is a reason why Russia and China do not accept any more NGOs in their soil… (9) Africa is a place with very much oil and natural resources. Some “aid workers” fit nicely in this environment…
Philanthropy is something to be conducted secretely. Not to be advertized. Be very suspicious with those who shout to the world about how much charity they do.
Stop believing. Start questioning.
Oh and something else: The Dutch also kill newborns with disabilities. Does not fit here in this article, but it just popped into my mind. To fill in the picture soft of speak. (10)