Terror in Paris: A CHRISTIAN Europe is the only solution… Again.


Terrorist attacks in Paris. (1)

Humanism and multiculturalism finally get results. Love is on the air everywhere. The world is better. Now the fascists will say “We told you so” and the anti-fascists who are the new fascists will say “You are fascists” and the real fascists will continue to slaughter and when we are awaken it will be too late. And all the anti-Christians will say “You are the same with them” and the Christians will be looking at them with sadness. And if anyone says anything about the fact that Europe has been dealing with STUPID things for so long (see. gay marriages and the “right” for adoption because this is the most important issue in a disintegrating society) rather than build mounds that would help us in the face of the hurricane that is coming, he will be accused of racism, bigotry, phobias etc.

When the “Pray for Paris” hashtag appeared many people started showing the REAL CAUSE of the catastrophe: What is important now for the “progressive” Europeans is to show to everyone that sciences, humanism and arts did not flourish in a Christian Europe, that the Muslims are not to blame, that there are only some lunatics killing in the name of their religion, that Christianism and Islam is the same, that we are all immigrants, that everything is as we imagine they are. Everything needed to keep believing in our nice ATHEISTIC ANTI-CHRISTIANIC DREAM that we live in a world where we can do anything to anyone.

What to wish to a continent that is sleeping but… good night and sweet dreams.

See you in the Islamic Europe of 2050 where we will meet secretly to yearn CHRISTIAN Europe that we have been blaming for everything for so long.

Related sources

We are all gay. And black. And women. And…

When some years ago his enemies wanted to hurt the image of Comandante Marcos, they spread the rumor that he is gay. The answer from the leader of the Zapatistas was not something like “Subcomandante has laid half of Mexico” but a rather surprising answer which make his movement even more popular.

“Yes, Marcos is gay. Marcos is gay in San Francisco, black in South Africa, an Asian in Europe, a Chicano in San Ysidro, an anarchist in Spain, a Palestinian in Israel, a Mayan Indian in the streets of San Cristobal, a Jew in Germany, a Gypsy in Poland, a Mohawk in Quebec, a pacifist in Bosnia, a single woman on the Metro at 10pm, a peasant without land, a gang member in the slums, an unemployed worker, an unhappy student and, of course, a Zapatista in the mountains.

Marcos is all the exploited, marginalised, oppressed minorities resisting and saying ‘Enough’. He is every minority who is now beginning to speak and every majority that must shut up and listen. He is every untolerated group searching for a way to speak. Everything that makes power and the good consciences of those in power uncomfortable – this is Marcos”. (1)

Be with the minority. Never be proud when you are with the majority. Be nervous when you are with the majority. Almost never has it decided correctly about something critical…

Look again where you belong. Look again where you stand. Are you afraid?

Charlie Hebdo attack: Censorship. Freedom. Respect. And why one cannot overlap with the other (yes, with RESPECT too!)

Hooded gunmen dressed in black burst into the office of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo Wednesday 7/1/2015, killing 12 people in a coordinated strike and escaping onto the streets of Paris.

The three suspects behind the attack have been identified, Paris Deputy Mayor Patrick Klugman told CNN. Two of them are brothers.

French authorities vowed to step up security and apprehend those responsible.

“Everything will be done to arrest (the attackers)”, French President Francois Hollande said in a speech Wednesday night. “… We also have to protect all public places. Security forces will be deployed everywhere there can be the beginning” of a threat. (1)

It seems tragic.
It seems unfair.
It seems wrong.

And it is.

But are we calm enough to see the obvious?

Showing disrespect to things which are holy to other people is also…


No, the one does not justify the other.
These statements are just both true. At the same time.

Killing people is bad. Christianism is the first who said that.

But which fascist was defeated by showing Jesus Christ fucking God and the Holy Spirit fucking Jesus? What kind of freedom of speech right was justified and honored by showing Jesus Christ fucking God and the Holy Spirit fucking Jesus?

Lack of limitations, lack of rules, is characteristic of the jungle…

And now all the animals are let loose…

He was a loving, caring, witty gunner…

A soldier is killed. [1]

UK is shocked.

BBC commented heavily on the dead soldier. [2]

“Lee was lovely. He would do anything for anybody, he always looked after his sisters and always protected them. He took a ‘big brother’ role with everyone”

“He wanted to live life and enjoy himself”

“All he wanted to do from when he was a little boy, was be in the Army”

“An extremely popular and witty soldier”

“He was a passionate and life-long Manchester United fan”

“someone who would be “sorely missed by all who knew him”

I understand hyposciry and narrow-mindedness are inherent characteristics of the British in general (and many countries have suffered a lot by that), but couldn’t we at least be SOMEWHAT serious?

Yes, a murder has been commited and that is horrible. But stay there. What do we need the other stuff for?

What does it even mean that “all he wanted was to be a soldier”?!? Do we know that soldiers kille people? Is that good? Is (offensive) war just? Is (offensive) war right? Is (offensive) war good? Does Britain has ANY right to be in Afganistan at this time? Does Britain has ANY right to kill people (including women and children) in any other country whatsoever? Isn’t anyone killed in Afganistan “witty”, “passionate” or “lovely”? Wouldn’t anyone killed in Afganistan by british troops be “missed”?

Hell, I honestly think that we would even find a Manchester United fan among those Afgans killed!!!

Fuck the juridical system! U-S-A !!!

Arrersting without telling his rights. Senators asking for trial under the “military law” so that he does not even have rights (why waste money on Guantanamo if we are not using it?). Authorities already suspecting “Russian training”. And of course, everything done over an American citizen who is accidentally injured to the throat and tongue so that he cannot talk. (1, 2)

Is it a movie?

Is it a novel?

Nooooo!!! It is… U.S.A. !!!

Go go go!!!!

U – S – A !!!!!! U – S – A !!!!!! U – S – A !!!!!!

Fuck Iran! Fuck Korea! Fuck EVERYBODY!!!

Becaaaaauuuusseeeeeee… we are U.S.A. !!!

The land of no rights.

The land of minors with guns (but no alcohol).

The land where No Laws is the law.

When will the responsibles of the non-killing of that suspect be held accountable? We cannot have terrorist suspects alive, thus having authorities pass all this stressful process. COME ON GUYS!

Now that I think of it better, who the fuck thought of that “juridical system” anyway? Why have such? Can’t we solve our problems with guns as any civilized cowboy? Why even have such a system when you have… POWER?!?!?


There have been other empires before USA. And there will be many more after it. The Greek Byzantium did not last 1,100 years by trespassing the rights of everyone when it wished so. If USA does not understand that being a superpower makes her have super-responsibilities as well, there will come a time when someone else will have more power and impose his own “justice” to her. And then it would be too damn late to ask for… Justice…


Excuse me.

Can we have the juridical system back?

Exit mobile version