Old theories. New theories. All the same… (?!)

dn25223-1_300

When physicists translated a 13th-century Latin text into modern equations, they discovered that the English theologian who wrote it had unwittingly predicted the idea of the multiverse in 1225. While the work probably won’t advance current models, it does show that some of the philosophical conundrums posed by cosmology are surprisingly pervasive.

In particular, Tom McLeish, a physicist at Durham University, UK, and his colleagues applied modern mathematics to a 1225 treatise on light, De luce, written by medieval philosopher Robert Grosseteste. Grosseteste had been studying the recently rediscovered works of Aristotle, which explained the motion of the stars by embedding Earth in a series of nine concentric celestial spheres. In De luce, Grosseteste proposed that the concentric universe began with a flash of light, which pushed everything outwards from a tiny point into a big sphere.

Grosseteste assumed that light and matter are coupled together. When the initial pulse of expanding light-matter reached a minimum density, it entered what he called a perfect state and stopped expanding. This perfect sphere then emitted a different form of light called lumen, which propagated inwards and swept up lingering “imperfect” matter, compressing it like a snow plough. The less dense region of light-matter left behind could then reach its perfect state and crystallise into a new sphere embedded in the first one, which would emit its own lumen. This process continued until only a core of imperfect matter was left behind, which gave rise to Earth.

Crunching the numbers, McLeish’s team found that computer models of this process will yield exactly the sort of universe Grosseteste was describing: inwardly propagating concentric spheres. (1)

What seems new, is old.
What seems innovative is unoriginal.
What seems clever is just a copy-cat.

It’s not only light and matter which are interconnected (brilliant idea by the way). It’s reality, light and matter which are all interconnected with our ideas!

Did it occur to you that the only thing which separates Big Bang from Eternal Universe is you?
Don’t you know you ARE the center of the universe?

Have you forgotten you are God?

The soul of the universe…

New stem cells can be created if you make the environment around normal cells, more… stressful (e.g. acidic). (1, 2) (although this discovery was later doubted – see here and here)

Everything can become life. Life is in everything. What we consider dead, has the potential to become alive. What is alive, entails death.

People in the old days believed universe was alive. Should we stop making fun of this opinion? Dying is just something we imagined, something we invented. Living is just something we imagined, something we invented. Arbitrary characteristics, based on nothing.

Oh, you fool human!

Oh, you arrogant men!

What made you think you can define life?

The soul of the universe penetrates everything.

Who are you to deny its existence?

Universe, Life, Divine.

Ancient alien life might have been incubating on strange exoplanets just 15 million years after the birth of the universe. Although nothing more complex than microbes could have existed back then, the possibility may poke holes in the notion that the universe is fine-tuned for human existence. (1)

But why is that notion so important?
Why is the anthropic principle so important?
What are some (atheists?) really trying to do by making such comments?

What is really more divine?
The idea that the Universe is made for humans to exist?
Or the idea that the Universe is made for life to exist in general?

Listen to the stars.
Feel the cold space.
It is full of life.
It has ALWAYS been full of life…

You are part of something important.
Something bigger than you.
Something poetic.
You know it.
You have felt it.
Are you ready to accept it?

> Do not forget to read the respective post (entitled “Being part of One. Entangled particles. Big Bang.”) at the Harmonia Philosophica Blogger portal! <

CMB, Plank, Earth: A fractal world.

The most detailed map of ripples in radiation left over from the big bang – known as the cosmic microwave background, or CMB – will let cosmologists hone their theories of how the universe evolved. This new view of the CMB comes from the European Space Agency’s Planck satellite. Just how sharp is it? Find out using the pictures below, which show the Planck map and its predecessors alongside corresponding images of the Earth, blurred to mimic the cosmic maps’ resolution. (1)

Images of CMB correspond to images of our world.

Structures in the cosmos tend to repeat themselves. We live in a fractal world. A world lives within us.

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%