Overview

The rapid development of AI and AI agents in particular, has made the evaluation of the AI outputs necessary so as to adhere to the best ethical standards we have collectively accepted as civilized individuals and as progressed societies. The definition of what is ethical though has for a long time been an unsolved problem for philosophy. Despite that, this unsolved problem is something that we should tackle immediately if we want a future that includes both humans and AI in a harmonious balance.

0. The goal

First we start with the goal. In this case, the goal is evident:

Formulate the principles that AI should follow so that it behaves in an ethical way.

This is a good start, but as will see later on, the words used also contain the problem...

1. The problem definition

When building ethical AI, the first thing that we should teach the AI is the problem itself. Without knowledge of a problem no one can ever solve anything, right? We said in the goals above that the goal we strive for is to make AI behave in an ethical way.

But...

What is ethical?

This question has not been answered definitively up to now, by no one. Every possible theory that was formulated to try to explain ethics, has other theories that disagree and try to explain ethics in a different way. (rf. to the related article mentioned in the beginning, for a brief overview of the main theories regarding ethics).

READ ALSO:  Chess AI does not know chess - The death of Type B strategy and its philosophical implications

1.1 The benefits of the problem

Besides the obvious benefit of knowledge, knowing (and letting the AI know as well) that the definition of ethics is not a solved issue, will bring an unexpected benefit to the AI we train.

That knowledge of the limitations of our philosophy (will talk about theology later on) regarding ethics will make the AI aware that any "knowledge" that is fed into it regarding ethics with a label of certainty should be discarded or examined carefully before even considered as valid input.

There is nothing more dangerous than dogmatism. And the moment we start using assumptions as 'truth' without even considering the possibility of them being untrue, at that exact moment we start being dogmatic.

Ethics is a dangerous place to be dogmatic.

Let's start with that then.

Repeat after me.

I DO NOT KNOW.

Teach that to your AI agents.

And we'll take it from there.

One small step at a time...

To be continued...

Discover more from Harmonia Philosophica

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by ExactMetrics