Fear experiment on a 9-month baby. Science. Ethics. Humanity.


You’ll have heard of Pavlov’s dogs, conditioned to expect food at the sound of a bell. You might not have heard that a scarier experiment – arguably one of psychology’s most unethical – was once performed on a baby.

In it, a 9-month-old, at first unfazed by the presence of animals, was conditioned to feel fear at the sight of a rat. The infant was presented with the animal as someone struck a metal pole with a hammer above his head. This was repeated until he cried at merely the sight of any furry object – animate or inanimate.

The “Little Albert” experiment, performed in 1919 by John Watson of Johns Hopkins University Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, was the first to show that a human could be classically conditioned. The fate of Albert B has intrigued researchers ever since. (1)

READ ALSO:  Atheism as a set of Beliefs (and not a religion, so what?). Atheism as an Obstacle to progress.

Science likes to experiment.
But a human would never experiment on another human.
A human would never make a baby cry just to “learn” something.

We may find it normal for science to be “ethically neutral” today.
But this was not always the case.

There was a time when science and religion was one.
There was a time when science and humanity was once one.
Now they have followed separate paths.

We have “human sciences” only because science is not humanitarian…

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments (


%d bloggers like this: