US Navy, AEGIS, data, information, Parmenides, ONE…

Navy Sub Collision

Having data is not the same as having information.

Other nations have SM-3 missiles (1). But not one of them can use them to shoot down a satellite as USA did… (2)

SM-3 launch to destroy USA 193 satellite
AEGIS intercepting the satellite

Having a set of destroyers is not the same as having a Navy.

Other nations have AEGIS-like destroyers (3). But not one of them can claim they have built a whole anti-ballistici missile defence umbrella with them… (4, 56)

Interconnection between systems, data sharing, data interpretation into useful information and information dissemination between all involved parties, is what makes US Navy the best navy.

It is not a matter of who has the best units (which is also the case in many classes of ships/ submarines, but not all). It is a matter of who has made the best TEAM out of them all. Even the best Borei-class submarine (successor of the legendary Typhoon class in Russia) is absolutely useless withing a battle field if it is acting as a separate unit…

The philosophy of ONE is immensly important in War…

SM-3 missile launch

Detecting nuclear explosions, “detecting” nuclear explosions…

The new are full of headlines on how CTBTO managed to detect the nuclear blast of the North Korea recent test. Through sensors – both seismic and even radioactivity sensors (really?) – the agency is said to be able to determine even the type of the device tested. (1, 2, 3)

This is what technology and science gives us!

Really?

Think again!

It is all a matter of prejudice. As modern fortune-tellers, scientism lovers feel oblidged to  We THINK we can detect a nuclear explosion with the detectors deployed by CTBTO only because we ALREADY know a test took place!!!

Simple, yet the TRUE ESSENCE of our “capabilities”. Have we not known the “bad” N. Korea would do any test, we would still be discussing various theories on what this “unexplained” phenomenon might be…

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%