Feeling different! Feeling human!

BA56B04084895D5F1EF6E93B3D2D829D

Two interesting news…

First: Where do humans fall in the food chain? You can probably already guess it’s somewhere between cows and polar bears, but a new study now puts a number to it: Somewhere between 2.0 and 2.6, depending on where you live. That’s on a scale of 1 to about 5, in which plants are 1s and carnivorous apex predators like killer whales are 5.5s. In other words, humans are in kind of the same plane as anchovies and pigs. (1, 2)

Secondly: Which organism is the fastest evolving? It seems the slitherers got off to a fast start. The first two full snake genomes to be sequenced – belonging to the Burmese python and the king cobra – show that they have one of the fastest rates of genetic evolution among vertebrates. (3)

If we do not have the largest genome (see here), if we are not at the top of the food chain, if we are not the fastest evolving species, then WHAT are we anyway?

Our efforts to find out who we are via the materialistic “all research and analysis is based on our body” path has met a dead-end. According to that path, we are something between the… strawberies and the anchovies – well behind the snakes.

But do you FEEL unimportant?
Do you FEEL like nothing?
Do you FEEL an animal?
Do you believe you are like a pig or less than a strawberry?

Maybe in order to think more clearly we should stop thinking…

Medicine. The oppression of prediction. Ruined lives.

In Israel there is an orgasm of gene pre-screening tests regarding breast cancer genes. (1)

Ruined psychologies…

Ruined families…

Mastectomies and early marriages, because of the fear of statistics.

Prediction is a good thing. But a prediction whose result is accepted anyway as “true” seizes to be a “prediction” and starts becoming an oppression. The fear of death has overpowered the lust for life. Life destroyed by medicine – the very same tool which used to protect it…

Evolution, species, oversimplification & the death of Occam…

Evolution does not necessarily form species. (“species” based on the ‘similar genes’ definition) (1)

This applies to Meiofauna and probably to other large-populated organisms like bacteria. Latest theories have found that not even human cells within the same brain have the same genome. (2)

And the same applies for the gens into our body. (3)

Harmonia Philosophica (@Wordpress or @Blogger) has for a long time pointed out the subjectivity of definitions and the problems with the term “species”. How can one built such an “important” theory of life based on something so subjective? When something is complicated, trying to simplify it ends in disaster.

Occam’s razor needs replacement with something like… Occam’s brain!

Brain, body, DNA, “uniqueness”…

It was once thought that each cell in a person’s body possesses the same DNA code and that the particular way the genome is read imparts cell function and defines the individual. For many cell types in our bodies, however, that is an oversimplification. Studies of neuronal genomes published in the past decade have turned up extra or missing chromosomes, or pieces of DNA that can copy and paste themselves throughout the genomes. (1)

Our neurons do not seem to all have the same genome. (2)

If it not the DNA sequence, then what “mystery” does rule our body? Could it be…something NOT in our body? Nuh! My free will based on my deterministic DNA-based body cannot accept that! 🙂

The RNA World hypothesis…

The RNA World hypothesis is a difficult one to accept. It seems to improbable that RNA evolved alone into that elaborate mechanism of self-copying. We prefer believing that other enzymes catalysts evolved separately. (1) Sure. It is like we do not like the idea of a DVD Recorded evolving alone. And we break it up into pieces so that we can imagine its self-evolution better…

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%