Religion-Science Philosophy articles series
The H1N1 virus
The goal of this Knol is to present a summary of the case Jane Burgermeister, a science journalist, who filed charges at the FBI against the UN, the World Health Organization (WHO) and various pharmaceutical companies in which she accuses those organizations of delibetarely creating the H1N1 virus is a lab and spreading it with malice intentions or for profit gain. Due to the very sensitive nature of the subject it must be explicitly noted that this article does NOT offer medical advice on the H1N1 flu. In case you have that sicness you must contact your doctor.
The case of Jane Burgermeister
In the legal case Jane opened against WHO she stated that the H1N1 flu has been actually developed in a lab and deliberately spreading it. She claims that genetical code of swine flu, bird flu and human flu cannot be combined in one new virus by an “accident” of nature (WHO says that H1N1 “swine” flu is most probably developed from “bird” flu virus – see ). In her site she presents some facts that show that maybe some specific laboratories have mixed various viruses together with shipping them worldwide. She also presents the case of various pharmaceutical companies promoting vaccines that are not thoroughly tested for profit.
In the case presented Jane claims that the plan involves deliberately spreading the fllu virus not only for money profit of the pharmaceuticals but also for transferring control of the US to organizations like the UN and WHO. The main ideas behind the case presented are :
- On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations (UN) declared, without adequate scientific evidence, resulting in much criticism from experts, a worldwide ‘Level 6 Pandemic’, so triggering laws that allow control over troops, law enforcement and health services to be transferred to the WHO and UN. According to the International Health Regulations of 2005, which has been incorporated into legislation also in The International Partnership on Avian Influenza of 2005 of the USA and other country’s national pandemic plans, the WHO and the UN become the controlling agencies of the US in the event of a declared Level 6 Pandemic, and are entitled to control of this country under martial law, with obvious implications for all of the above under the pretext of fighting a pandemic emergency.
- Refusing a WHO-mandated vaccination has been criminalized; police can therefore use deadly force against “criminal suspects” refusing these vaccines.
- WHO was involved in nearly triggering a pandemic this winter in Austria, by supplying a well known pharmaceutical with a H1N1 virus that the company then used to contaminate 72 kilos of vaccine material. This incident, that very nearly killed millions, was investigated by WHO, EU and Austrian health authorities only perfunctorily. This incident was neither investigated or reported upon by any of the mainstream media corporations controlled by the aforementioned international bank-based corporate criminal syndicate, which, via institutional investment firms such as XXX, also owns the pharmaceutical.
- On April 28, 2009, a shipment of said deadly virus from a WHO/Pharmaceutical-affiliated (company name not shown since the case is in trial) laboratory in Mexico was released from a suspiciously atypical hazardous biomaterials container, allegedly by accident, on an intercity train bound for Geneva, Switzerland, exposing sixty-one passengers. Again, there has been no credible forensic investigation of this incident by the UN/WHO or Swiss/EU officials, and none of those exposed in this alleged bioaccident were ever properly treated for their exposure to this virus. [Comment by Spiros Kakos: Others claim that the flu was result of a laboratory experiment error.  ]
- In spite of the scientific evidence that adjuvants are dangerous, WHO is specifically recommending the production and use of vaccines containing oil-based adjuvants in the planned mass vaccination campaign starting in September. In clinical trials for the swine flu vaccines that are currently underway, the NIAID/CDC is testing only vaccines without adjuvants, even though clinical trials are supposedly done to give an accurate picture of the vaccine that will be administered, not an exceptional case.
- An Emergency Use Authorization allows any company that gives experimental vaccines to Americans during a declared public health emergency to be protected from liability in case of injury to those vaccinated. [Comment of Spiros Kakos: Seems nice not to be controlled…]
- The vaccine manufacturers are set to make huge profits from the sale of vaccines mandated by the WHO, especially as governments such as the US have given them a blanket immunity.
- WHO refused to release minutes of a key meeting on July 7, 2009, when its “vaccine advisory board” — packed with transnational pharmaceutical corporation executives as observers — recommended to WHO that it order forced vaccinations around the world using their vaccines, ensuring them vast profits.
- The pharmaceutical company in question patented a vaccine for the allegedly new “H1N1” virus in 2008. [Comment of Spiros Kakos: i.e. at least a year before the outbreak…] 
- WHO has made a unilateral declaration of pandemic level 6 on the basis of a relatively harmless H1 N1 influenza, manipulating data and so misusing a provision designed for a deadly plague, in order to declare a pandemic level 6 and acquire new emergency powers throughout the globe. Cases of H1N1 influenza have been relatively mild, requiring little or no medical intervention. And deaths from the H1N1 virus remain extremely low, at less than one half of one percent of reported cases as of July 6, 2009. There is no sign of the virus mutating to become more deadly.
- WHO altered its official definition of pandemic in 2003, being guilty thereby of manipulating. According to WHO’s present definition, a declaration of pandemic can be constantly maintained. In fact, every year since 1918 would have been Pandemic Level 6 under the WHO’s latest definition.
For more details and news about the case please visit the official site of Jane at http://www.theflucase.com/.I am not a doctor and do not know such details as when a vaccine is considered “thoroughly” tested. However I do know that when an organization like the CDC in the US is calling for vaccination and in the same statement states that “tests of the vaccines are underway”  something wrong is happening. Maybe some vaccines are ready. Ask your doctor about that. I repeat that I am not here to give medical advice. However there is an increased concern on the process followed in the H1N1 case with the excuse of the “emergency” in hand. Every reader can go to the links provided in the next section and decide on his/her own.
The H1N1 case aftermath
After the World Healh Organization raised the alarm and caused panic in the world, after all major countries bought great numbers of vaccines for the H1N1 flu and after most citizens in those countries refused to be vaccinated, the case was “closed”. The flu did not result in the number of deaths predicted and proved to be much more mild than predicted by the “independent” WHO. After the fiasco and while most countries struggled to sell the millions of unused vaccines they had acquired, the EU council decided to investigate if WHO was influenced by big pharmaceutical companies in its announcements.  
What was evident to all people, probably is not so evident for the politics ruling the world…
Maybe money does make the world go around…
Links to the “Swine Flu Case” portal
One can follow these links to go to the web portal that presents the case of Jane Burgermeister against WHO and make his own decision based on his own judgement.
- Jane Burgermeister main page: http://theflucase.com/
- Data one can use to file crimical charges in his country for the H1N1 case (according to Jane Burgermeister of course): Guide to criminal charges
- Additional evidence for the “swine” flu case: Additional evidence for H1N1 case
Happy reading and good thinking! Maybe this case is something wrong, but we can only decide after we have thought of all the facts and evidence. Not before that. So critical and sensitive subjects like health need all the information one can have. And it is better to have information not only from the ones who make money out of that case but from other independent persons too…