, , , , , , , ,

Anders Behring Breivik’s defence have told his trial he should be considered sane. Lawyer Geir Lippestad told the court in Norway his client had been driven by extreme politics, while on the same trial the prosecution has called for Breivik to be considered insane [1].

Is that really happening? What is the matter with “progressed” societies? Foucault would be turning over in his grave with this. Insanity as a tool of society to impose rules and codes of conduct…

Men. Women. Spatial tests. Social tests. Ocean. Wind. [Harmony]

The dream of every murderer is to be characterized as “insane” so as to be better off with the sentence. However modern Norway cannot let that happen! If you do something different in the “paradise” called Norway, you have no other choice but to “be” insane! Illogical! Out of your mind! It does not matter that naming you insane will lead you better off to a nice psychiatric resort instead of a prison. It does not even matter that you yourself claim that you are perfectly sane and have deliberately planned what you did months before.

Science hypocrisy and dogmatism in a Black Hole...

Because we cannot handle exceptions to our nicely formed rules, we are too eager to tag anything irregular as “insane”. Breivik cannot have really thought of what he did. He cannot have really wanted to do what he did.

You MUST be insane!

So that all the others can remain “sane”…

Bad Chinese eating dogs! Good Westerners, eating... everything else!

Read more for the role of psychiatry in modern society at the “The Dictatorship of the science of Psychiatry” article.