More and more scientists who write in peer reviewed journals believe that global warming is human made. (1)

Well, disregard for now the "Winter, cold, global warming, CERN, extreme cold…" article I wrote some days ago and the fact that CERN has a different opinion.

Focus on the "peer review" process. Few understand its true meaning.

A system where others judge what you write as right and wrong will converge to the opinion of the MAJORITY with mathematical accuracy. Because... the majority is what decides what is right and deserves to be published.

Sounds cyclical and tautological. And it is.