Category: Peer review
-
Peer review by patients! Understanding the Universe…
When it comes to clinical research, the participation of the people being treated—the patients—usually ends by the time the study is submitted to a journal. A few U.K.-based publishers are now looking to change that. Last month, BioMed Central, an open-access publisher, announced that in 2015 it will launch the journal Research Involvement and Engagement,…
-
Pioneers need no references!
A scientific paper on the aortic valve published on 1968. Had only one 500-years-old reference: Leonardo da Vinci who first explored the matter of how this valve worked. (1) This is what today’s scientists will never understand: Pioneers do not need references.
-
Human made climate, global warming and “peer review” and a tool for the stupid majorities.
More and more scientists who write in peer reviewed journals believe that global warming is human made. (1) Well, disregard for now the “Winter, cold, global warming, CERN, extreme cold…” article I wrote some days ago and the fact that CERN has a different opinion. Focus on the “peer review” process. Few understand its true…
-
Science, Nature, Cell. Destroying science.
Scientific magazines hinder development of science. At least this is what a Nobel winner postulates. Journals like Science and Nature are just promoting topics that could lead to bigger sales, as any other publisher would do. (1) The “citations” system is just a tool to promote the “stars” that need to be promoted. And its…
-
phD – NOT a chance to be innovative!
Don’t be afraid to post what you think is correct. Unless it is for your phD… (1) Because we demand from our phD students NOT to be original. After your phD do whatever you wish… But FIRST, you will pass through the “initiation”. FIRST, you must obey… Fucked up society. Fucked up science. Nietzsche rise.…
You must be logged in to post a comment.