Itching brain. Gods becoming mice.

Itching is a highly contagious behavior. When we see someone scratch, we’re likely to feel itchy, too. A research shows contagious itching is hardwired in the brain.

For this study, Chen’s team put a mouse in an enclosure with a computer screen. The researchers then played a video that showed another mouse scratching.

“Within a few seconds, the mouse in the enclosure would start scratching, too,” Chen said. “This was very surprising because mice are known for their poor vision. They use smell and touch to explore areas, so we didn’t know whether a mouse would notice a video. Not only did it see the video, it could tell that the mouse in the video was scratching”.

Next, the researchers identified a structure called the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a brain region that controls when animals fall asleep or wake up. The SCN was highly active after the mouse watched the video of the scratching mouse. When the mouse saw other mice scratching – in the video and when placed near scratching littermates – the brain’s SCN would release a chemical substance called GRP (gastrin-releasing peptide). In 2007, Chen’s team identified GRP as a key transmitter of itch signals between the skin and the spinal cord.

“The mouse doesn’t see another mouse scratching and then think it might need to scratch, too,” Chen said. “Instead, its brain begins sending out itch signals using GRP as a messenger”.

Chen’s team also used various methods to block GRP or the receptor it binds to on neurons, while maintaining the ability to scratch normally when exposed to itch-inducing substances. Chen believes the contagious itch behavior the mice engaged in is something the animals can’t control. “It’s an innate behavior and an instinct,” he said. “We’ve been able to show that a single chemical and a single receptor are all that’s necessary to mediate this particular behavior. The next time you scratch or yawn in response to someone else doing it, remember it’s really not a choice nor a psychological response; it’s hardwired into your brain. (1)

So “the brain” sent the signals. Without the mouse even “seeing” (how do we know?) or even “wanting” (how do we know?) to do anything. The brain “sees” (what?!?) the other mouse scratching and decides on its own.

Really?!

Are we so much loving the idea of the brain controlling what we do that we are ready to believe into a brain which does things on its own without even an optical stimulus? Are we so much intoxicated by the idea of us not having free will, of us being just slaves to matter, that we are ready to attribute abilities of conscious beings to lifeless substances?

We believe into an ever-seeing brain with a “free will” of its own.

And yet we despise the idea of an ever seeing free will spirit.

We are what we want to be.

We were gods.

And we have chosen to be mice.

Now starting to feel a bit itchy…

Walking without help. Fate. Genes. Modern neuroscience.

Many new parents still think that babies should develop at their own pace and that they should not be challenged to do things that they are not yet ready for. Infants should learn to roll around under their own power, without any “helpful” nudges, and they should not support their weight before they can stand or walk on their own.

According to neuroscientist Audrey van der Meer, a professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) this mindset can be traced back to the early 1900s, when professionals were convinced that our genes determine who we are, and that child development occurred independently of the stimulation that a baby is exposed to. They believed it was harmful to hasten development, because development would and should happen naturally.

However, modern brain research shows that early stimulation contributes to brain development gains. The neurons in the brains of young children quickly increase in both number and specialization as the baby learns new skills and becomes more mobile. (neurons in very young children form up to a thousand new connections per second) Van der Meer believes that even the smallest babies must be challenged and stimulated at their level from birth onward. (1)

We imagine that everything is pre-set. We believe we are matter obeying physical laws. But the main reason for us walking is not any physical law, but the simple fact that we want to walk. The main reason for us growing is not any gene, but the shear fact that we want to grow. We wish we were better. We imagine ourselves in the future.

How can you grow without wanting to grow?

How can you live without wanting to live?

How can you die without wishing to die?

Will yourself into existence.

Break the void of the cosmos.

Fall.

Start walking among the stars…

Deciding. How? Fate vs. Free will 1-1 (or perhaps the match did not even start)

How is the brain able to use past experiences to guide decision-making? A few years ago, researchers supported by the National Institutes of Health discovered in rats that awake mental replay of past experiences is critical for learning and making informed choices. Now, the team has discovered key secrets of the underlying brain circuitry – including a unique system that encodes location during inactive periods.

“Advances such as these in understanding cellular and circuit-level processes underlying such basic functions as executive function, social cognition, and memory fit into NIMH’s mission of discovering the roots of complex behaviors”, said NIMH acting director Bruce Cuthbert, Ph.D.

While a rat is moving through a maze – or just mentally replaying the experience – an area in the brain’s memory hub, or hippocampus, specialized for locations, called CA1, communicates with a decision-making area in the executive hub or prefrontal cortex (PFC). A distinct subset of PFC neurons are activated during movement, while another distinct subset, less engaged during movement in the maze, are inhibited during replay. (1)

Decision making is one of the greatest mysteries in science.

How do we decide on what to do?

Surely we base our decision on existing knowledge. Surely we speculate on the future impact of our decision. But when and how do we reach the point of no return? When and how do we say “That’s it! I have thought about it enough! It is time to decide!”? Our decisions are always made based on an incomplete picture of the world. Our decisions are taken based on an incomplete set of logical reasoning which is never extensive enough to analyze everything related to our decision.

And yet we decide.

Are we gambling based creatures? Or is it possible that after all and below all this apparent ignorance lies a layer of deep inner intuitive knowledge? Fate. Free will. They seem different. And yet something weird tells me that they are not so different after all…

A long long time ago a Thinker wrote a poem…

A long long time ago people had starred in the abyss…

A long time ago we knew all existed.

Now we “know” some things do not.

And we spend all our lives trying to find our way through ghosts…

Empathy: Feeling sad for one death. Not caring for millions… All a matter of choice.

ONE death is a tragedy. One million is a statistic.

You’ve probably heard this saying before. It is thought to capture an unfortunate truth about empathy: While a single crying child or injured puppy tugs at our heartstrings, large numbers of suffering people, as in epidemics, earthquakes and genocides, do not inspire a comparable reaction.

Studies have repeatedly confirmed this. Not only does empathy seem to fail when it is needed most, but it also appears to play favorites. Recent studies have shown that our empathy is dampened or constrained when it comes to people of different races, nationalities or creeds. These results suggest that empathy is a limited resource, like a fossil fuel, which we cannot extend indefinitely or to everyone.

Now scientists believe that empathy is a choice that we make whether to extend ourselves to others. The “limits” to our empathy are merely apparent, and can change, sometimes drastically, depending on what we want to feel. (1)

Everything seems to be a matter of choice.

Quantum mechanics has showed this.

And yet some of us do not want to believe it.

You see the belief that we are soulless meat seems more appealing to them…

Choose to extend yourself to the cosmos.

Choose to love everyone.

Choose to choose.

Make God Be.

Be God.

Freedom of choice? Causality. Being “free” via slavery to the “laws”…

Professor Ted Honderich in his book On Determinism and Freedom (2005) argues that the notion of free will that lies behind all talk of choices and responsibility is incoherent, and cannot be assimilated to the account of physical reality the sciences have arrived at. In particular, Honderich objects to the notion of origination: that is, to the claim that an action can originate from a deliberate, conscious choice without prior physical cause. He argues that any decision is instead in reality an event or series of events in the neural pathways of one’s brain, and that all such events are embedded within physical causal sequences. (1)

We are free.
We are enslaved to the laws of physics.
We formulate the laws of physics. (observer/ quantum mechanics)

We are gods.

And we are bound by the laws we create.

Simply accept the antiphasis.
And the antiphasis will be no more…

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%